On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 07:40:56AM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: > On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 14:25 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > I dunno what the solution is. Maybe have stdio work with non-automate > > commands as well, and having all commands be able to output stdio- > > specific data that would be more oriented for scripts, as well as > > human readable output, all depending on how the command was called. > > ...maybe (eventually) move the non-automate variants to a separate > executable (mtn) that calls monotone (which now only does automate) and > reformats the output for human consumption?
Thereby ensuring that the automate interface actually does provided all the information the human interface does. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
