Bruce Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> But you're right that that probably means get_current_revision_id is > a bit wrong: maybe it ought to be get_base_revision_id or something? Shows how out of touch I am. There is such a thing, of course (called get_base_revision_id). I guess the question is should there be a special case for when there's no changes, so that get_current_revision_id returns the same as get_base_revision_id? (My hunch is that it doesn't matter, so it may as well be left as it is.) _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
