On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:17:04AM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: > I'd almost think so too, but any output massaging probably wouldn't be > entirely portable. Then there's also the issue of, what if you don't > want every single rev to get a changelog entry? Things like translation > updates, or feature branches that should have one entry at the end when > they're merged, rather than 10 "implemented X" and 50 "checkpoint; > 243/371 tests pass now" entries.
log --exclude po --stay-on-branch ? -- Nathaniel -- "But suppose I am not willing to claim that. For in fact pianos are heavy, and very few persons can carry a piano all by themselves." _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
