On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 15:13 +0100, Thomas Keller wrote: > Ulf Ochsenfahrt schrieb:
> > 5. Multiple Access > > You'd need to figure out some way to handle the locking issues you get > > with multiple concurrent access. > > There is absolutely no concurrency in stdio today and I doubt it is > useful to allow such things when stdio works on a single db in the > backend since their access would need to be streamlined anyways. So if > an action is running, the service would probably need to give some > "busy" signal back to the calling request. Netsync also has absolutely no concurrency (kinda hard to have real concurrency in a single-threaded program...). What it does have is a way to switch between connections after doing just one thing, and it would be fairly easy to extend it to allow for automate commands. -- Timothy Free (experimental) public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
