In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27 Nov 2006 08:49:26 +0100, Ulf Ochsenfahrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ulf> Just to clear this up. No I'm not saying that the conversion ulf> stuff should be removed. I don't mind it being there for people ulf> to use, as long as its not enabled by default, which it isn't. I've no problem going with that. Now, what happens if you leave it disabled, but someone else asks monotone to convert between CRLF (native) and LF (internal) for some files? I can see scenarios where such disagreements will lead to, uhm, weird stuff, for example if both of you are on Windows (and therefore get CRLF as line ending)... That leads me back to thinking that we still need to mark files that are getting changed, and that something automatic should happen to them, so a file will look the same checked out as before it got checked in. Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
