> Yep, I'm aware of these. The problem is that they all need a > terminus running outside the firewall, and also are probably > forbidden under our policies as they are generic tunnels not just > protocols which happen to run over HTTP.
*shrug* It might be time to start investigating extending monotone to present an HTTP interface as well (i.e. mtn serve --protocol http). Using RESTful programming techniques, it might be possible to represent the features of the netsync protocol into a more verbose HTTP context. Could be something to put on a wishlist somewhere. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to invest in such an endeavor. -- Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */ _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
