On 2/23/07, Thomas Moschny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 23 February 2007, William Uther wrote:
> C: For update: mtn pull branch && mtn merge && mtn update
But you are of course right with your observation that one often has to type
'mtn pull && mtn update'. So what about having a --pull switch for update that
uses the default arguments of the last pull?
hg goes the other way. It has -u (--update) argument for pull. I rarely use it
but I think it is better to have -u for pull than -p for update. I
also believe that UI
convergence is a good thing :-)
Zbynek
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
