-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 William Uther wrote: > P.S. This is not a request for the current project I'm working on. I > was thinking of using monotone with undergrads though, and they often > require some constraints for their own good.
Isn't the "constant whining" (at the very least on each commit and update) of monotone encouraging enough to try a merge? Forcing people to merge-before-sync reminds me the ugly update-before-commit of CVS times =( (the difference being they could work locally unmerged as long as they want, until they manage to merge it all up - but also has the asymmetricity of "first sync'er wins" just like in CVS "first committer wins") Lapo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJF4W42AAoJELBiMTth2oCDcekP/0EWVfcXItiGodHxEDEanvUv e5Z4fJNlDeXmEx66AT0BpEf9xEu93QakmhwfTMscsCsDkpHuhAjd00zSEv6Cf9rB G/H1SS8C95tg//RBUyWFy53IQk6wGKmckADVppZox5luj//+tESQ7jqZstoFqNoq 7ZjH+bP+3Fjoze+4KBYCJBp/dclBcbhi1czZBVQvHyhA3PBf+BvECY6+r5WHnDJ2 5VQg0vKdW1DOePWekWbmKGgmuLhZPLzjj7KxyXH7HxbONejI6GJH84BB8Ib8rkV+ dAGF/J36UNnm8ICNE7LyRnn9tdyggH7FVVtEyKTg6xXBMVwPaipsOABjDXFAsXwP JMUg/rPT4OqJXVenlcymUbzywtHO7oZhSB6qe0tJSbZ68sHBmvoZxAAkpt5ESgi8 YPSufNn6W013Gs2rxoMqd4my2peYvyjShSv1dILWUF7fCgIja10e2TboejrTosZo an0CiMJcukT678KBaQSrBMr+MUKnH8DSEgaW3AL8k+OkhTuzt5lkO0M7DjObX5XK F6ypE+PirpLkVPwb6zLiAaj1v/gR6S91H2epBGAgRkpiaXHxivctObjuY8ty82cc aHBF5OM4HJIL7idUDnzbmjpw7IGmvXPnfM8iBSB7qIZqW/rOcYNQmkyte4af6kiD JbyZlNNaewx8uR/nKI6s =OPA+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel