On 2/28/07, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted another pair of eyes on it, especially now that there's a
> conversion of packet.cc too (which code I am not entirely happy with).
Ah, I didn't see the magic words "please review for mainline" or
similar.
Oh. I kinda assumed that was implicit. Please review for mainline?
I will reply to your other comments later; I have to run.
zw
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
