On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:42 -0400, Jack Lloyd wrote: > [Article summary: 307 digit = 1019 bit integer of special form > factored by Lenstra. It took 11 months on a very large cluster (exact > size not mentioned)] > > While of course most/all Monotone keys are not high value enough to be > worth this kind of effort, it may be worthwhile to either increase the > default keysize and/or allow the user to specify a different size,
IIRC, this would be as simple as making constants::keylen bigger or configurable. Also I *think* I heard some mention of possibly migrating to some variety of elliptical keys, but I can't find that now. > Are there any provisions for key rollover ATM? (Either due to > factoring or more likely events like machine compromise) Not yet, but (like everything else but the kitchen sink ;-) that should come when we get policy branches. -- Timothy Free (experimental) public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel