On Thursday 13 September 2007, William Uther wrote: > It seems the recent annotate changes in > ae0a9c829c508851a9bcfbcc22d6b088ab472ff6 don't pass the test suite. > Is this because the tests were broken too?
"Broken" is maybe too hard. Ralf brought back in sync the docs and mtn's behavior for annotate with and without --brief, and the tests also have to be fixed accordingly. But, while we are at it, the discrepancy between docs and behavior showed that --brief is really a bad name for that switch, so we should use something more intuitive like --only-revs (which would invert the meaning again, yes, the human readable form with author and date should be the default.) - Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
