Michael Haggerty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> (I've already made this offer [to cooperate in adding mtn support to > cvs2svn] to Markus Schiltknecht but he doesn't seem interested.) I suspect because cvs2svn isn't incremental. So it's a way to do a one-time conversion of a CVS repository, but many people really want to do incremental conversions, following a CVS repository as it changes. However, it clearly has a place. It's pretty fast, and as you say, copes with all the horrors of CVS. And the new version does a decent conversion to at least git (which is close enough to mercurial/monotone/etc.), though I think it creates many unnecessary branches. (This is a specifically git thing, and I guess is a matter of taste. I think cvs2svn is creating branches in order to construct revisions corresponding to CVS tags. But then from git's point of view the branch doesn't really need a name, since the tag's pointing to it. So I think I'd leave off the branch.) [...] _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
