On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 06:02:05PM -0400, Ethan Blanton wrote: > Nathaniel Smith spake unto us the following wisdom: > > 'summarize' still seems too long to type conveniently. Would 'show' > > be too generic? > > I don't think it's too generic, necessarily, as I think one normally > associates generic commands with operations on revisions, but it sort > of seems funny in the presence of show_conflicts. I thought of > 'view', but that's not so much a command to be performed as an action > to be taken by the user, which might be a metaphor shear.
show_conflicts should probably become something else in the long run anyway (merge --preview or something?), so that doesn't bother me, and I do like 'show' better than 'view'. Maybe we should just go with that. Anyone want to implement it? Should probably have almost no code of its own, just share code with log (which might need a touch of refactoring first to make that easy). -- Nathaniel -- "Of course, the entire effort is to put oneself Outside the ordinary range Of what are called statistics." -- Stephan Spender _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
