> > Thoughts? I should emphasise that I'm not suggesting this for the > > release Richard wants to make Thursday. That would be entirely too > > risky. Also, as a data point, neither the Monotone nor the Pidgin > > databases contain any strings that would be changed by this proposal. > > What about the OE database?
Same. But you don't have to take my word for it: $ mtn -d OE.mtn db execute "select distinct domain from db_vars" | grep xn-- $ mtn -d OE.mtn db execute "select distinct name from revision_certs" | grep xn-- $ mtn -d OE.mtn db execute "select distinct id from public_keys" | grep xn-- > And while on the OE subject, why not use the > OE database in your performance tests, since it's by far the biggest > and slooooooooowest repository that is publically available and used in > real life I'll do that in the future, but the snapshot is not that much bigger than my local monotone database: -rw-r--r-- 1 zack zack 154M 2007-10-20 11:23 monotone.mtn -rw-r--r-- 1 zack zack 183M 2007-10-20 21:39 OE.mtn zw _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
