Stephen Leake wrote:
> Cygwin is also 32 bit.
Yes, and won't be different anytime soon.
> Perhaps it should be:
> o Windows (32 bit) _native_ _cygwin_
> There are people running 64 bit Windows now. I assume it has some sort
> of "32 bit compatibility mode", but we should still make it clear.
I do (run WinXP 64) and yes: it executes win32 code flawlessly (and
thanks for it, as only 2-3 software in 100 support win64 :P).
I guess the best is just to avoid nominating win64 until there's an
ACTUAL win64 package... ;-)
(and it's not like mtn really *needs* the extra power...)
Lapo
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
