"Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Stephen Leake > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hrm... any objectives against checking in this patch (netxx upstream is >>> dead, right)? >> >> ETIMEDOUT isn't defined in MinGW. The WIN32 timeout case is apparently >> handled by WSAETIMEDOUT. > > bleah > >> I've checked in a patch: >> >> #if not defined(WIN32) >> case ETIMEDOUT: >> #endif > > Please make that > > #ifdef ETIMEDOUT > case ETIMEDOUT: > #endif
Ok, done. > -- the E* constants are guaranteed since C89 to be macros, so this is > safe in general. Does that mean the gcc MinGW compiler is not compliant with C89? That's surprising. -- -- Stephe _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
