Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> You point out that it is not consistent with git, but Bruce > explained that git is not consistent with anything. I've heard > elsewhere that git is not internally consistent either. So I'm not > sure that consistency with git should be a goal. I agree that consistency with git shouldn't be a goal. Gratuitous inconsistency doesn't seem like a good goal, though, especially with what I'd guess is a well-recognised (if not well-understood) git command. Why not "uncommit" (by analogy with "unrecord" from darcs)? Or perhaps an option to "update" (more of an analogy with git's "reset" I suppose)? [...] _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
