On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Matthew Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Markus Wanner wrote: > >> In the archive I've read that boost::program_options didn't do what we >> want. Looking at the boots documentation, I also see boost::asio - could >> that perhaps be a better replacement for the (unmaintained) netxx? >> Anybody used boost::asio before? >> > > I use boost::asio in my astxx library. I have not had any problems with it, > seems well designed. Also there is a non-boost version of it for the anti > boost crowd (I happen to be pro-boost).
The description of the differences might be of interest: http://think-async.blogspot.com/2008/05/boostasio-vs-asio.html Particularly > — Asio is header-file-only and for most uses does not require linking against > any Boost library. Boost.Asio always requires that you link against the > Boost.System library, and also against Boost.Thread if you want to launch > threads using boost::thread. Zbynek -- http://robotika.cz/
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
