On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Felipe Contreras < [email protected]> wrote:
> > Or I can modify your code. Sure, if you like, it's not particularly complicated. I am hoping to arrive at something where this isn't generally required though. ;) I think "<unknown>" is a better start point. Agreed, now that I look at it. > Why not? It's a better approximation than "author" which is already > available in the git commits. What would be the advantage of having > both git author and git committer set to mtn author? > I'll try this and see what it looks like. Cheers, Derek
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
