On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Thomas Keller <m...@thomaskeller.biz> wrote:
> Am 16.05.10 11:19, schrieb Stephen Leake: > > Thomas Keller <m...@thomaskeller.biz> writes: > > > >> For the others: If you think your branch is ready for the final merge, > >> give me a note if you want to get it reviewed another time, otherwise > >> just merge it. > > > > For net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.13604-stephen_leake, I've removed > > the --recursive option from 'undrop'. So I think this is ready to merge. > > > > net.venge.monotone.restrictions.implicit-includes will change what > > 'revert' does with some restrictions; since 'undrop' shares core code > > with 'revert', there's no need to wait for that branch. > > I haven't followed your conversation with Derek further - just to get a > ok from you both: undrop is still needed even after the new restriction > code landed, right? I don't think the changes to the restriction code have any effect on this so yes, as far as I understand it, undrop is still needed. Cheers, Derek
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
