Thomas Keller <[email protected]> writes:

> Am 14.06.2010 11:08, schrieb Stephen Leake:
>> Thomas Keller <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>>> We, the monotone developers, are very proud to announce the new 0.48
>>> release of our distributed version control system.
>> 
>> Thanks for your work on this, and everyone else's, too.
>> 
>> After the releasek, you bumped the version to 0.99dev. It was suggested
>> to use 0.90 instead, in case we need 0.91 before 1.0. I think that's a
>> good idea.
>
> Well, actually we don't want another point release between 0.99 and 1.0.

We certainly don't want to plan on that, but allowing for it seems
reasonable. 

> We should concentrate on getting 0.99 stable and out within the next
> couple of weeks and then finalize i18n and fix open bugs from 0.99 for
> 1.0. And I plan to make the time span between 0.99 and 1.0 reasonably
> long enough to let enough people find bugs which we can fix by then.
> Having more minor steps between 0.9x and 1.0 just makes it harder to
> stop people merging features into mainline during that time... i.e.
> "hey, stabilizing these new things shouldn't be a problem, we have a
> couple of more point releases left, right?!".

Perhaps we can use 0.99 this time, but plan on 1.90 before 2.0.

-- 
-- Stephe

_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Reply via email to