Am 15.06.2010 06:21, schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler:
> This morning, I downloaded 0.48 for Linux ("mtn-0.48-linux-x86.bz2")
> and the SHA checksum matched. I just downloaded it again on two other
> computers, and in both cases, the checksum didn't match. I don't have
> access to the first computer right now to compare files, but I'm
> wondering if this is a mistake or something sinister. Was that binary
> supposed to have changed this afternoon?No, and I think the underlying issue is a problem with the automatic generation of these checksums, i.e. my code :( When the binary was uploaded, it might have already been looked at through the downloads page and because of that a wrong checksum of a partially uploaded file was calculated and cached. This cache invalidates itself after 24 hours, so it should be correct in a few. Sorry for the inconvenience - I start to think I should remove this dynamic hashing again altogether... Thomas. -- GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | [email protected] | http://thomaskeller.biz Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
