In message <4ced08f9.1040...@bluegap.ch> on Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:45:45 +0100, Markus Wanner <mar...@bluegap.ch> said:
markus> For monotone, we had netsync flag days, which represent full markus> incompatibilities (can't speak to each other). Then we also had database markus> migrations, where a one-way upgarde is possible, but not backwards. So markus> we could encode that in the version by using MAJOR.MINOR.REVISION, where markus> a netsync flag day increments the major version number and a required db markus> migration increments the minor version number. 0.99 is different enough from 0.48 to deserve being the upcoming 1.0, there are enough changes even if it's compatible on a netsync level. With that, I mean to say that netsync changes shouldn't be the only criterium. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
