On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 08:06:42AM -0400, Stephen Leake wrote: > Ethan Blanton <e...@psg.com> writes: > > >> An alternate is to live with the 'ignoring upstream changes due to local > >> delete' warning in 1.0. > >> > >> Why is that not ok?
How would monotone know which is upstream and which is downstream? -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
