-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 If you do "About MonoDevelop" you'll see indeed the MonoTouch team is less than 5% of that list.
That's collaboration, not "made by" They are not the same team at all, the comparison is not adequate. El 04/06/2011, a las 09:19, Pete Macko escribió: > Blame? Absolutely not. It is what it is, and as time goes by it will likely > get better. > > Actually what the first part of my rant was was my frustration over the > recent handling of the product, exacerbated by a very long day followed by > too much beer and a lack of filter between spleen and keyboard. I understand that > Misdirected angst? For sure! I have to hand it to the ximian and MD > volunteers - no "and the horse you rode in on" replies yet. The private > message stating "it takes a skilled team to build a barn but any idiot can > knock one down" was accurate, though. > > A better way of putting it would have been "here is a list of minor things > you may run into developing with this stack", THEN the pointless griping > about our favorite company. Or to have typed it all out, looked it over, then > deleted it instead of sending. That would have been a very better way indeed. > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 3, 2011, at 23:45, Natalia Portillo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Just a thing >> >>> code 1" - friggin' lovely. For a FOSS IDE, MonoDevelop is a nice bit of >>> work, but it's buggy and tempermental, the last thing you want to deal >>> with when trying to meet deadlines (well other than having your >>> development platform pulled out from under you 2 weeks before a major POC >>> release by a bunch of copraphagic corporate-types). While it's amazing >> >> Do you blame the GCC guys (Free Software Foundation) when Xcode, >> KDevelop, Anjuta, Emacs, <put your favourite GCC IDE here> sucks, crashes, >> sends all your unsaved work to Limbo ??? >> >> MonoDevelop just happens to be the only MonoTouch IDE, that doesn't mean >> MonoTouch requires it, and of course, that doesn't mean the MonoDevelop guys >> received ANY cent from the money that everyone spent on MonoTouch or >> MonoDroid. >> >> They added support to MonoTouch because they wanted. >> They would have been free to say MonoTouch guys "hey! make your own IDE, or >> fork our, but don't use our name!" >> >> So, don't blame the compiler guys for the IDE bugs, they're mostly different >> guys. >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) >> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org >> >> iF4EAREIAAYFAk3pqlsACgkQv/wfOsykIRSFEQEAqDtruSUIDgLrA/CcVouJPw2H >> hwt4cd9oUV63QPkVaaEA/iIE3oIH3Ifxw+f41QNFvhLSYhBj+ut/flvzBfuZDnIr >> =9mjK >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iF4EAREIAAYFAk3qKBQACgkQv/wfOsykIRTb3gEAja2TWkSHyn7pNA79hooqBZb9 /6kidItNfuQe4SIwc7ABAKYwxMlgZ0kka2kAyTgrn19NSQywUGcuWINCFNeQ3Nz8 =6sTc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ MonoTouch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
