Hi, Thanks for reporting those issues. We are aware of these problems and we are working on a solution for them.
Lluis. El 13/02/2012, a las 06:04, rnendel escribió: > Little more - I may be being unrealistic to expect any kind of > intellisense-like implementation to actually consider what I've chosen as > being a queue for what to prioritize on the next compeltion. For example, > am I way out in left field to expect that if I actually "bother" to find > "null" vs. DBNull 20 times that I could, in any reasonable way, expect > "null' to actually appear at the top of the list for once? This is true for > every situation where prioritization is an issue. > > I can tell, many times, that "some sort" of sorta-kinda prioritization is > tried, but it fails more often than not. > > So, a recommendation - either spend some time cleaning up intellisense - > figuring out what the prioritization should be and how to incorporate in a > clear way user selection patterns, or just bring up everything in an > alphabetized list. I've never been a fan of "fuzzy logic" and the current > intellisense is, well, chuck-full of the fuzzy feel goods that give me a > headache and wear out my escape key. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://monotouch.2284126.n4.nabble.com/OMG-please-fix-intellisense-tp4382910p4382919.html > Sent from the MonoTouch mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > MonoTouch mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch _______________________________________________ MonoTouch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
