Without trying it, I'm not sure. But I dont see why it couldn't be implemented. It's just a method lookup, which is fine in MT. (using Reflection.Emit isn't, tho)
For REST stuff I've used RestSharp, which works fine with MT - tho I would have LOVED to have ShouldSerialize.... maybe I should bake it into SimpleJson :) On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Baramuse <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just like to know is the ShouldSerialize pattern is "implemented" in > monotouch. > For example for the XMLSerializer. > > As it is a "code-generated pattern", I guess maybe not because of the > JIT-limitations of Monotouch ? > > Thanks for the confirmation. > > Regards. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://monotouch.2284126.n4.nabble.com/ShouldSerialize-Pattern-tp4657232.html > Sent from the MonoTouch mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > MonoTouch mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch -- Nic Wise t. +44 7788 592 806 | @fastchicken | http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicwise b. http://www.fastchicken.co.nz/ mobileAgent (for FreeAgent): get your accounts in your pocket. http://goo.gl/IuBU Trip Wallet: Keep track of your budget on the go: http://goo.gl/ePhKa Earnest: Self-employed? Track your business expenses and income. http://earnestapp.com Nearest Bus: find when the next bus is coming to your stop. http://goo.gl/Vcz1p London Bike App: Find the nearest Boris Bike, and get riding! http://goo.gl/Icp2 _______________________________________________ MonoTouch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
