TBH, I feel sqlite-net stuff does enough LINQ, for the more complex stuff LINQ is really slow and pure SQL statements with proper indexed joins wins every time, Microsoft never got LINQ-SQL performing anything like proper SQL statements, if they can't get it right, what chance has anyone else.
In a lot of my projects I used LINQ for prototyping but then re-wrote in select statements for production, the performance increase was always noticeable. My last (and first app!) had over 100 tables and some of the databases were well over 100mb in size sqlite-net coped perfectly with that level of complexity. just my opinion. ATB Alex On 11 Dec 2012, at 12:58, sama446 <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the reply juan. I figured another way, by mixing ADO.NET and basic > LINQ which are inbuilt with MonoTouch. Also using SQLITE-net for some basic > purposes. > > So the conclusion comes as MonoTouch team doesnot offer proper LINQ, or > doesnt care about improving it further, so enthusiastic developers could do > it by themselves(google provides dll's and custom code snippets to club and > use it as required). > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://monotouch.2284126.n4.nabble.com/How-to-generate-DBML-in-Monotouch-tp4657811p4657823.html > Sent from the MonoTouch mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > MonoTouch mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch _______________________________________________ MonoTouch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
