On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:20:32 -0700, Christopher Brown wrote: > Stevan et al., > > Thanks. That is exactly what I want to do. I will take a look at > MooseX::Storage and read on how the Moose exports works. ( It might be a > little foreign to me since I am an Exporter guy. I know, I know. I may > lean again on the list for another questions or so. but I will give it my > best shot. ) > > Okay ... MooseX::Common is a little weak. MooseX::Getopt::Commom? > MooseX::Attributes::Common? MooseX::CommonAttributes? MooseX::Attributes? > > I'll have to sleep on this one. As you can see, I have more than a little > trepidation of picking a stoopid name. > > Cheers, > > Chris
A frightening suggestion is to look at Moose::Tiny. You should be able to subclass it to give the pre-defined types you want (or possibly look them up) ... but I'm not sure this would do the lookup into a per-class module (::user ::password) ... it's currently set up to give the closest approximation to what Object Tiny defaults to. -Chris
