--- On Wed, 9/24/08, John Napiorkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: John Napiorkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Multiple coercions ?
> To: "Charles Alderman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2008, 12:00 PM
> --- On Wed, 9/24/08, Charles Alderman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > From: Charles Alderman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Multiple coercions ?
> > To: moose@perl.org
> > Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2008, 11:34 AM
> > Meta questions:
> > 
> > Is the purpose of this list to only report bugs or
> discuss
> > design  
> > questions?  Or is it to help out Moose users?  Should
> the
> > list be  
> > split into moose-dev and moose-users?
> > 
> > Perhaps if a user happens to overlook the version
> > they're running  
> > before asking a question, it could be accepted as a
> newbie
> > question in  
> > a moose-users list conversation.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Charles Alderman

Right now we have IRC channels split this way.  To be
honest, the IRC gets a lot more traffic than the mailing
list in terms of discussion and help.  This makes sense to
me since Moose is rapidly growing and also I've noticed
that for Perl there have been a preference to IRC over
mailing lists and other types of dicussion (blogging, etc). 
There is a good part to this, since IRC is immediate, but of
course there is a downside since IRC is very unstructured
and it's not searched by the big search engines, which I
think hurts us PR wise.

Try irc://irc.perl.org#moose for general moose questions
and irc://irc.perl.org#moose-dev for moose new development.

Peace

John Napiorkowski

> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:14:49 -0500 (CDT)
> > Re: Re: Multiple coercions ?
> > 
> > > Ok, Moose _0.58_ was just released, and
> you're
> > reporting bugs in 0.31,
> > > which was released approximately 10 months ago?
> > >
> > > Why?
> > >
> > >
> > > -dave
> > >
> > > /*==========================
> > > VegGuide.Org
> > > Your guide to all that's veg
> > > ==========================*/


      

Reply via email to