On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:42:09AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> 1: by the way I had to fight a little when I starting working on Coat,
> some people were angry because of the idea behind Coat; I'm happy to see
> that, at the end, I was right: there's is room and even need for
> light-weight Mooses.
No, the fight was because you weren't really trying to be compatible at
that point, more "inspired by".
Hence Mouse.
Personally, I'd suggest you consider contributing to Mouse - it's much more
robust, cleanly designed code than Coat and because of the meta compatibility
the upgrade path is much cleaner.
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/
