On Dec 31, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Oliver Charles wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:50 PM, John Napiorkowski
<jjn1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I'd also add that as we begin to close off the development of DBIC .
08100 and begin contemplating .09, that's going to be a Moose
inspired rewrite
I had a feeling this was the case (after reading more about
Cata-moose) - so I've been holding off even looking at MooseX::DBIc.
whats cata-moose?
i'm in an interesting position here... i have some old crufty perl
code that was going to be scrapped and rewritten not in perl,
said rewrite might have to be delayed but i still need to make the
perl code usable. two things needed for that...
decent object model ( hello moose ), fairly brainless way to store
said objects... if a .09 is contemplated, how long
between contemplation and initial work starting on it? I think if I
use DBIC given the timing of mid february to rip the guts out
and replace, that .081 would be the path I need to follow if I use DBIC.
