Sartak wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Elliot Shank <p...@galumph.com> wrote:Is there a way to avoid the duplication here:use Foo (); with 'Foo'; Is there a way to get "with" (or something similar) to do a require?This works for me. If you're using a really old version of Moose you may need to upgrade.
Hrmm. I had some existing code fail after an upgrade. I'll have to check it again.
