I'm thinking of switching the CHI distribution from Moose to
Any::Moose, as a way to reduce install dependencies and overhead. The
Mouse feature set is adequate for my needs.
But I realized that classes could get split between Moose and Mouse
depending on if/when Moose was loaded. e.g.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use CHI;
use CHI::Driver::File; # This will use Mouse
...
use Some::Module::That::Uses::Moose;
...
use CHI::Driver::Memcached; # This will use Moose
In practice, CHI driver classes get loaded on the fly as caches are
created with those drivers, so it isn't an option to preload all of
them.
Is it a problem for related classes to be split arbitrarily between
Mouse and Moose? Could it present a testing nightmare of having to
test all the possible combinations? Or are Moose and Mouse so
compatible that it doesn't matter (other than for class introspection,
etc.)?
Thanks
Jon
