2009/7/7 Hans Dieter Pearcey <h...@pobox.com>: > Bag is going to be renamed to Hash::Counter, probably. Counter is secretly > Num::Counter, or something, though not really since Num doesn't exist (yet).
Do we really need to keep Bag? I don't think it has many practical applications. The API is intended to implement an actual bag (that is, a member can appear multiple times), but is obviously flawed: 1. it exposes implementation details if the hash is readable 2. it doesn't support arbitrary data, it stringifies So I think it's best if we keep it in MX::AttributeHelpers for compatibility, but simply drop it from core.
