On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:42:02PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Craig A. Berry wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Dave Mitchell<da...@iabyn.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm planning to have a quick look at the PPI issue tomorrow, but apart >>> form that I consider everything done apart form release steps like >>> updating Module::CoreList and a quick look at any smoke from today's >>> commits. >> >> David Favor, who reported the PPI problems, also reported trouble with >> Moose and maint-5.10: >> >> http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=48314 >> >> http://davidfavor.com/archive/perl-bug/moose_fails.txt >> >> I'm cc'ing moose@perl.org in hopes the Moose gurus can offfer a tuit >> or two to help diagnose what's going on (or provide reliable not-a-bug >> advice). > > When the RC0 was announced, I tested a bunch of modules including Moose > against it with no problems. > > I just tested Class::MOP and Moose git HEAD against RC0 and it still > works fine. > > Is it possible that there's something wrong the particular perl that the > bug reporter used?
Thats the general feeling I'm coming to. I'm going to assume these reports are spurious unless anyone else reproduces it. -- In the 70's we wore flares because we didn't know any better. What possible excuse does the current generation have?
