On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:47:52PM -0700, Karen Etheridge wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:14:02AM -0500, Jesse Luehrs wrote: > > parent is dual-life, so it wouldn't be a case of dropping support, it > > would just be an extra dependency for 5.8. That said, an extra > > dependency for no actual reason does seem a bit questionable (which is > > why I was asking for the reasoning). > > Have you looked at the base.pm code? It needs to die as quick a death as we > can bring it.
If "ugly code" was a reason to avoid using a module, I would be significantly less productive in perl d: -doy
