The guy obviously devoted 2 minutes to look at the framework (and probably most of the others), to fill the article.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Nathan White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I posted this comment, I doubt he'll publish it. > > Your comments about Mootools couldn't be further from the truth. $splat > turns anything into an array. This is because Mootools simplifies the code > following DRY principles and only uses 'apply' and not 'call'. If we look at > your console.log yes at that moment it is an object but if we look at what > happens in the next line an object will simply become the first item in an > array. So mootools handles fine. The other nice aspect of mootools is how > they extend the prototype. Mootools also gives you 'attempt', > 'bindWithEvent', 'delay' and 'periodical' all different variations of bind. > 'create' is a generic bind creation function depending on the options, it > creates all kinds of neat binds. Very elegant code. > > Before making comments like "No professional developer should allow himself > to use such code for a real project." You really need to understand the code > and understand how javascript works. It is also necessary to have a proper > understanding of the philosophy of the framework that your examining. > > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Valerio Proietti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> Honestly, dont even bother. >> >> His ignorance just makes me laugh. >> >> >> >> On Sep 12, 2008, at 11:28 AM, loki der quaeler wrote: >> >> >>> >>> i already left him a comment pointing out that he couldn't have tested >>> $type correctly to make the statements he's making, but i don't have the >>> patience to formally deconstruct his acerbic attitude towards mooTools. >>> anyone have more patience? >>> >>> >>> http://dhtmlkitchen.com/?category=/JavaScript/&date=2008/09/11/&entry=Function-prototype-bind >>> >>> >> > -- Guillermo Rauch http://devthought.com
