Hi nir,
I'm not %100 certain of what your 2nd solution is but I can tell you that
your problem's solution is not to use MooTools if you need your script to be
this portable. We cannot offer you support on this because we don't have the
time to figure out how to get MooTools to run in the same environment as
Prototype. It's beyond the scope of our work.
If it were me, I would avoid a framework entirely. I would create a
namespaced object with methods that helped me do the things I needed to and
nothing else. For instance, let's say your project was called "nir" I would
have functions like this:
NIR.addEvent(element, type, function)
NIR.inject(element, where, target)
NIR.request(url, options)
etc.
If you wanted to use a framework like MooTools, you could then have two
accompanying scripts:
One script would use MooTools and all the methods I mention above would just
translate to MooTools:
NIR.addEvent = function(element, type, function) {
element.addEvent(type, function);
};
And the other script would use Prototype or no framework at all. Then
clients could include whichever they wanted.
I realize you have a deadline, so to speak, but you must also realize that
the nature of your problem falls outside the scope of the kind support
you're likely to find here, as we don't try to make MooTools play well with
Prototype.
Nir Tayeb wrote:
>
>
> I know that, but i haven't time to rewrite the code - I'm from israel
> and in one week I'm going to be a soldier in Israel Defense Force.
> This is a task which I will remain to the developer who come after me.
> But for now, i need a concrete answer - what is the influence of using
> solution #2 ? will it work in FF/Safari like it work in Internet
> Explorer?
>
> thanks, nir.
>
> On Oct 19, 8:58 pm, nutron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is a simple answer:
>> do not use a framework. Your code will work anywhere, though it won't be
>> fun
>> to write.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Nir Tayeb <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > No, and i will never do this, my script need to work on almost any
>> > site and it needs to be one version not depended on site specific code
>> > (one site can use prototype and the other will use dojo - my code need
>> > to be the same on both and work with both, for *example*).
>>
>> > I will very appreciate if someone answer on my original question
>> > instead of messing around with the things i already done and change.
>>
>> > thanks, nir.
>>
>> > On Oct 17, 5:20 am, Garrick
>> <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1351926&i=0>>
>> > wrote:
>> > > The prototype syntax has similarities with MooTools. Have you tried
>> > > modifying the syntax so it will work with prototype instead of
>> > > renaming everything in MooTools?
>>
>> > ------------------------------
>> > View message @
>> >http://n2.nabble.com/Prototype-and-MooTools-on-the-same-page-tp133734...
>> > To start a new topic under MooTools Users, email
>> >
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To unsubscribe from MooTools Users, click here< (link removed) >.
>>
>> -----
>> The MooTools Tutorial: http://www.mootorial.comwww.mootorial.com
>> CNET Clientside: http://clientside.cnet.comclientside.cnet.com
>> --
>> View this message in
>> context:http://n2.nabble.com/Prototype-and-MooTools-on-the-same-page-tp133734...
>> Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
-----
The MooTools Tutorial: http://www.mootorial.com www.mootorial.com
CNET Clientside: http://clientside.cnet.com clientside.cnet.com
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Prototype-and-MooTools-on-the-same-page-tp1337346p1352926.html
Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
