Are you sure it is outputting data in the response? I would check that first. I am using 1.2 and not having any issues with it.
Firefox and FireBug is a good start as you can see the response data from your ajax request in the console. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of electronbender Sent: Monday, 3 November 2008 12:06 AM To: MooTools Users Subject: Re: send() and evalScripts not working in 1.2 ? I havent done much 1.2 code, but get the code, and just evail it, wold that work? On Nov 1, 3:41 pm, Raphael Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This didn't work. Examining the response (via alert(response)) shows > the following: > > 1) with only evalScripts set to true, all the script tags are stripped > off. > 2) with evalResponse set to true, the script tags aren't stripped off > but aren't evaluated, either. > > On 1 nov, 07:55, Oskar Krawczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Raphael, > > > using update option might just not do the trick I remember having > > some troubles with it myself have you tried doing a: > > > ... > > onComplete: function(response) { > > $('responseDiv').set/inject/append(...) // pick one, considering > > what is your response > > } > > ... > > > Best, > > Oskar > > > On Oct 31, 8:13 pm, Raphael Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > > > I'm building a site that relies heavily on Ajax responses that include > > > Javascript. > > > > In 1.1 this wasn't a problem and if I had a code like: > > > > $('myForm').send({ > > > method: 'post', > > > evalScripts: true, > > > update: $('responseDiv') > > > > }); > > > > it would fetch the server response to myForm, update responseDiv with > > > it and execute all scripts in the response. > > > > Now in 1.2, I'm writing this code as: > > > > $('myForm').set('send',{ > > > method: 'post', > > > evalScripts: true, > > > update: $('responseDiv') > > > > }).send(); > > > > and I find that it ignores all the scripts on the response. Using > > > evalResponse (alone or in combination with evalScripts) didn't help > > > either. > > > > Any ideas?
