Hi again here is the article http://cssgallery.info/testing-mootools-apps-using-rhino-shell/
thanks On Jan 17, 11:30 am, hellspawn <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, I think i managed to make it work :) - at least this seems until > now - > I will compile an document and let you know > > On Jan 17, 2:14 am, hellspawn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi > > Thanks for your reply > > I'm almost there :) > > > i managed to fix 2 errors - one i tookit from a comment, and another > > i managed to fix myself > > but now I get another one > > > js: "mootools.js", line 39: uncaught JavaScript runtime exception: > > TypeError: Cannot set property "constructor" of undefined to > > "org.mozilla.javascript.interpretedfunct...@e7b3f2" > > at mootools.js:39 > > > the line that gives this error is > > > if (legacy && initialize) object.prototype = legacy.prototype; > > object.prototype.constructor = object; <-- here > > > is part of Native > > > can someone with a better understanding of mootools , to explain me > > why ? > > > thanks a lot > > > On Jan 17, 12:12 am, johnwait <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Here it is: > > > >http://ejohn.org/blog/bringing-the-browser-to-the-server/ > > > > I never played with it, but MooTools should run on it just fine (he > > > claims jQuery does), as it's mostly used for framework testing (it > > > will parse html, though without "rendering" it-so forget about > > > dimensions). There may also be other implementations out there as > > > well. > > > > -Jonathan > > > > On Jan 16, 5:55 pm, johnwait <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If I'm not mistaken John Resig (from JQuery's fame) worked a bit on a > > > > simulated browser's environment for standalone JS engines. You might > > > > want to have a look this way... > > > > > On Jan 16, 12:56 pm, hellspawn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > hi > > > > > is there any way to be able to run scripts built with mootools under a > > > > > js shell - like rhino-spidermonkey ? > > > > > I am trying to do this and of course I get errors related to missing > > > > > "window" variable. > > > > > > thanks
