So Does anyone think there is a better way to recreate the kwicks action?
I love it, and want it to work the same way, but cannot extend it to have
its motion accessed by a chain....

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Bennington Purcell <
[email protected]> wrote:

> i have been trying to duplicate my effect (which i really like) with
> accordian.  And can't do it.   however i can't seem to call the actions of
> Kwicks individually for the chain??  How will i know the names of the
> created actions?  Or do i even need to call them with a chain?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Bennington Purcell <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> So i guess i am just not doing this right.  I am using Kwicks.   So not
>> the regular accordian code.   Could i change my kwicks to this with out
>> losing functionality.   It would seem that if i wanted to chain them i would
>> have to convert?  Is ther another solution?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Garrick <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Bennington,
>>>
>>> Accordion Class has a 'display' method you could use.
>>>
>>> After you create an instance with var accord =  new Accordion(blah);
>>> create a chain, and have it display each one based on
>>> index.accord_chain.chain(); with a delay of sorts.
>>>
>>> Here's the doc for display method:
>>> http://mootools.net/docs/Plugins/Accordion#Accordion:display
>>>
>>> On Jan 16, 2:31 pm, Bennington Purcell <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I am using the elements script accordian thing i found online.    I
>>> like it
>>> > alot (here is the visible version as i have it currently :
>>> http://74.63.9.58/)  But now i want, when you load the page to begin
>>> with,
>>> > the 3 sections of the accordian to expand one at a time...   so it
>>> would
>>> > load...  then 1 would expand, then 2 and then 3.   So almost like you
>>> were
>>> > just mousing over it currently.
>>> >
>>> > Any easy way to do this??  (i guess it probably isn't super easy,
>>> becuase i
>>> > haven't figured it out)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks Guys
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to