I'll follow up off the group regarding getting involved with -more. The first thing is to get you added to the developer mootools group.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Shawn Van Ittersum (via Nabble) < [email protected]<ml-user%[email protected]> > wrote: > > Lucky me, I just picked up git a couple days ago, with the help of the > Pragmatic Programmer's Git book. > > Thanks for the additional pointers! > > On Feb 13, 11:48 am, nwhite > <changereal...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2323654&i=0>> > wrote: > > > I'm in the same boat. The key is to get up to speed with git. I have been > > > avoiding this one for a while now. This weekend I am taking the plunge > and > > going to wrap my head around it. Some of the developers have put together > > > some great tutorials on how to get started. > > > > http://ayurweba.dinamis.com/entry/2008/jul/04/contributing-to-mootools/ > > > > If your comfortable with svn you might want to look at this: > http://subtlegradient.com/articles/2008/04/22/cloning-a-git-svn-clone > > > > if you use a mac this is a good place to start: > http://subtlegradient.com/articles/2008/02/21/install_git_leopardhttp://code.google.com/p/git-osx-installer/downloads/list?can=3http://blog.macromates.com/2008/git-bundle/ > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Shawn Van Ittersum > > <svicalifor...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2323654&i=1> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Aaron suggests that anyone interested in contributing to Mootools > > > development should drop a note here. So here I am. :) > > > > > I've actually kept using 1.1.1 because of some bugs and performance > > > issues introduced in 1.2. But I really want to take advantage of the > > > 1.2 stuff, and seeing the forward momentum into 1.3, I'm excited to > > > get involved. I'm interested in patching bugs in 1.2 and contributing > > > 1.3. > > > > > I'll start today by re-evaluting my projects in 1.2.1 vs. 1.1.1 and > > > checking the bugs I encounter against the Lighthouse tickets. I know > > > there was a severe performance degradation in 1.2 in drag-and-drop > > > with multiple drop targets, due to a low-level change in how element > > > boundaries were checked. I'm eager to see if that's been fixed, and > > > if not, that may be my first contribution. :) > > > > > Please let me know how else I can be of help. > > > ------------------------------ > View message @ > http://n2.nabble.com/Interested-in-Contributing-tp2323345p2323654.html > To start a new topic under MooTools Users, email > [email protected]<ml-node%[email protected]> > To unsubscribe from MooTools Users, click here< (link removed) >. > > > ----- The MooTools Tutorial: http://www.mootorial.com www.mootorial.com Clientcide: http://www.clientcide.com www.clientcide.com -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Interested-in-Contributing-tp2323345p2323741.html Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
