thanks This: 2) the code must be relatively well written (it will likely be combed over by the development team before it goes out).
And this: 4) it should follow the general design principals that exist throughout the -core and -more libraries. Are the things I was aiming at. I will wait for the more then I M On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:52 PM, nutron <[email protected]> wrote: > It's the official plugin repository for the framework. By definition, the > contributors to it *are* the MooTools team. That said, the criteria to be a > MooTools -more developer are only that you are a) good at writing MooTools > code and b) consistently contribute to the project. In other words, anyone > can get involved with -more. All you have to do is fork the code in github > and start checking in bug fixes or whatever. You can fix documentation > errors, fix bugs, write unit tests, etc. > You can also submit your own plugins for the repository, but it's not a > drop-off box. We aren't interested in just taking things from people - if > you are involved and are committed, then adding your own plugins will be > welcome. If you just have something we think would be cool to include, we're > not as interested. > > The criteria for a plugin being accepted in to -more are as follows: > > 1) there must be a valid use case for the code - not just something that's > kinda cool that no one can figure out how to use. > 2) the code must be relatively well written (it will likely be combed over > by the development team before it goes out). > 3) it should, when possible, build on existing plugins if possible. > 4) it should follow the general design principals that exist throughout the > -core and -more libraries. > > Additionally, a minority of -more developers must agree that it belongs > (i.e. not just you). > > -Aaron > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Itay Moav (via Nabble) < > ml-user%2b132720-647556...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2354771&i=0> > > wrote: > >> mootools-more is developed by the Mootools team, or donations from us >> users? >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:28 PM, nutron >> <anut...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2354694&i=0> >> > wrote: >> >>> Note that MooTools -more will soon be getting a form validator of it's >>> own. It has already been translated into 15 languages. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Itay Moav (via Nabble) < >>> ml-user%2b132720-647556...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2354634&i=0> >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> thanks all >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Thierry bela nanga >>>> <bna...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2353296&i=0> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> I just want to add something about translation, >>>>> I have a very simple way to handle it, I use a Hash, >>>>> >>>>> var Language = $H(); >>>>> >>>>> var English = {key1: "value1", key2: "value2", ...} >>>>> var French= {key1: "value1_fr", key2: "value2_fr", ...} >>>>> //switch to english >>>>> Language.extend(English); >>>>> >>>>> //switch to french >>>>> Language.extend(French); >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> in my classes I just use Language.get(key) to output any text >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and it works fine. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> in my real use, I dont use objects (English, French) like in the >>>>> example but I generate hash values with the cms current language (here is >>>>> the joomla code) >>>>> >>>>> //php >>>>> $lang = array() >>>>> >>>>> foreach(array( //list of keywords here ) as $k) >>>>> //get the translation >>>>> $lang[$k] = JText::_($k); >>>>> >>>>> and then I extend the language hash on the fly >>>>> >>>>> Language.extend('.<?php echo getJSObject($lang); ?>.'); >>>>> >>>>> where getJSObject is a function that takes an array and return a >>>>> javascript object, a king of json encoding :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - cheers >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Lennart >>>>> <lenn...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2353296&i=1> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Or you can check it out here: >>>>>> http://pilon.nl/mootools/2008/11/28/hefvalidator-for-mootools-12/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Updated to 1.2 and with multi-language support. >>>>>> >>>>>> LP >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 19, 10:25 am, ryan >>>>>> <rtnetwo...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2353296&i=2>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > Hello >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I have used it, and updated it for 1.2... >>>>>> > Email me >>>>>> > (r...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2353296&i=3>), >>>>>> and I'll send you the code (or you can >>>>>> > ask me whatever problems you are having). >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Ryan >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Feb 19, 2:30 am, Itay Moav >>>>>> > <itay.malimo...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2353296&i=4>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > thanks, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > I will certainly review this code, but for the sake of healthy >>>>>> competition, >>>>>> > > be happy if someone who used FValidator with moo 1.2 with no >>>>>> problems and >>>>>> > > could tell about this. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > I M >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Frank Rossi >>>>>> > > <fr...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2353296&i=5>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > > You can use FormCheck, which is great! >>>>>> > > >http://mootools.floor.ch/en/index.htm >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > > moo, too >>>>>> > > > Frank >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:42:58 -0500, Itay Moav wrote: >>>>>> > > > > Moo >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > > > Did anyone use FValidator with mootools v1.2+ (as it says in >>>>>> the site >>>>>> > > > > it is build on 1.1)? >>>>>> > > > >http://zendold.lojcomm.com.br/fvalidator/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > > > I M >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> The MooTools Tutorial: www.mootorial.com Clientcide: www.clientcide.com >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> View this message in context: Re: Any experience with FValidator in >>> mootools >>> 1.2+<http://n2.nabble.com/Any-experience-with-FValidator-in-mootools-1.2%2B-tp2350345p2354634.html> >>> Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list >>> archive<http://n2.nabble.com/MooTools-Users-f660466.html>at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> > The MooTools Tutorial: www.mootorial.com Clientcide: www.clientcide.com > > ------------------------------ > View this message in context: Re: Any experience with FValidator in > mootools > 1.2+<http://n2.nabble.com/Any-experience-with-FValidator-in-mootools-1.2%2B-tp2350345p2354771.html> > Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list > archive<http://n2.nabble.com/MooTools-Users-f660466.html>at Nabble.com. >
