why not use this.parent?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Thierry bela nanga (via Nabble) <
[email protected]<ml-user%[email protected]>
> wrote:
> finally I got the solution:
>
> (function () {
> var success = Request.JSON.prototype.success;
> Request.JSON.prototype.success = function (text) {
> try { success.bind(this)(text); }
> catch(e) {
> this.onFailure(e);
> throw e;
> }
> }
> })();
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:52 AM, nutron
> <anut...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3093446&i=0>
> > wrote:
>
>> The important thing is that the Core is designed to provide you the tools
>> to do what you need, not to add as much flexibility as possible for all use
>> cases. Your use case is the edge case (Request.HTML is used 99% of the time
>> to update the DOM with HTML fetched from the server). Even though your case
>> is an edge case, there's an easy way to manage it: don't have the class
>> evaluate the scripts and then do it when it fits your logic flow.
>>
>> 2009/5/24 Fábio Costa (via Nabble)
>> <ml-user%2b98816-1760363...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967576&i=0>
>> >
>>
>> Thats cool, but why not increase flexibility if it is something that
>>> makes sense?
>>> And another thing that should be discussed is the request.HTML sometime
>>> you dont need all of its functions, some times you just need the response
>>> text and the javascript for example... i thought that there could be options
>>> to set what response you want to get... ust some thoughts...
>>>
>>> Fábio Miranda Costa
>>> Engenheiro de Computação
>>> http://meiocodigo.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Aaron Newton
>>> <anut...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=0>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Catching poorly formatted JSON would require parsing the JSON string
>>>> before evaluating it, which means basically making a JS parser for
>>>> MooTools, which I think is overkill. It's your job to return well
>>>> formatted JSON.
>>>>
>>>> As for when scripts are evaluated (which started this thread), the
>>>> best way to do this is to set evalScripts to false, then add your
>>>> onSuccess logic as an event and call $exec(javascript) like so:
>>>>
>>>> var r = new Requst.HTML({
>>>> ...various options...
>>>> evalScripts: false,
>>>> onSuccess: function(tree, elements, html, js) {
>>>> ...your operations
>>>> $exec(js);
>>>> }
>>>> });
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 23, 6:35 am, fabiomcosta
>>>> <fabiomco...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=1>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Thierry,
>>>> >
>>>> > i think its impossible to catch the error on the script evaluation
>>>> > because of the current method of evaluating globally the scripts.
>>>> > But maybe someone has a solution...
>>>> >
>>>> > On May 22, 3:46 pm, Fábio Costa
>>>> > <fabiomco...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=2>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Could be really useful too!
>>>> > > And i think that the onException is not that useful, i would like to
>>>> know if
>>>> > > anybody have ever used it...
>>>> > > I mean, its your headers, you are setting them... why should they
>>>> return
>>>> > > errors?
>>>> > > I don't see why i need this but if someone have ever used or needed
>>>> it
>>>> > > please report...
>>>> >
>>>> > > Fábio Miranda Costa
>>>> > > Engenheiro de Computaçãohttp://meiocodigo.com
>>>> >
>>>> > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Thierry bela nanga
>>>> > > <bna...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=3>
>>>> >wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > > exactly,
>>>> > > > if an error occur, there is not really a way to handle it.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > 2009/5/22 Fábio Costa
>>>> > > > <fabiomco...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=4>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > >> You mean like when the evaluation of the response gets an error,
>>>> right?
>>>> >
>>>> > > >> Fábio Miranda Costa
>>>> > > >> Engenheiro de Computação
>>>> > > >>http://meiocodigo.com
>>>> >
>>>> > > >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Thierry bela nanga
>>>> > > >> <bna...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=5>
>>>> >wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>> I want to be able to handle error when mootools evaluate the
>>>> response
>>>> > > >>> in Request.JSON.success, not only when the request is being
>>>> done,
>>>> > > >>> oherwise the overlay remains on the page and the only thing to
>>>> do is to
>>>> > > >>> reload the page :(
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>> 2009/5/22 Fábio Costa
>>>> > > >>> <fabiomco...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=6>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>> But the onFailure is fired when an error occurs on the request,
>>>> i don't
>>>> > > >>>> get your point.... :S
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>> Fábio Miranda Costa
>>>> > > >>>> Engenheiro de Computação
>>>> > > >>>>http://meiocodigo.com
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Thierry bela nanga <
>>>> bna...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=7>
>>>> >wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> I'll add something to this,
>>>> > > >>>>> I'm using Request.JSON to send data, if the request uses POST,
>>>> then I
>>>> > > >>>>> recover the page with a blocking overlay that should be
>>>> removed at the end
>>>> > > >>>>> of the request.
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> when en error occurs while evaluating the response in
>>>> > > >>>>> Request.JSON.success, I have no way to handle it and the user
>>>> only have to
>>>> > > >>>>> press F5 to get out of that situation
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> I think propose the onFailure event should be fired there
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> 2009/5/22 Fábio Costa
>>>> > > >>>>> <fabiomco...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=8>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> Don't you guys think that the scripts inside the HTML request
>>>> should
>>>> > > >>>>>> be evaluated after the onSuccess and onComplete events?
>>>> > > >>>>>> Im asking this because sometimes i need the HTML inside the
>>>> received
>>>> > > >>>>>> response to be inject in the DOM before actually evaluating
>>>> the script tags
>>>> > > >>>>>> into the response.
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>>> evalScripts could be a string like 'after' and 'before', and
>>>> of
>>>> > > >>>>>> course, for backwards compatibility, if you put true it would
>>>> eval the
>>>> > > >>>>>> script before the onComplete and onSuccess events.
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>>> Fábio Miranda Costa
>>>> > > >>>>>> Engenheiro de Computação
>>>> > > >>>>>>http://meiocodigo.com
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> --
>>>> > > >>>>> fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51
>>>> >
>>>> > > >>> --
>>>> > > >>> fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51
>>>> >
>>>> > > > --
>>>> > > > fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The MooTools Tutorial: www.mootorial.com Clientcide: www.clientcide.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> View this message in context: Re: [Moo] Re: Request and
>> evalScripts<http://n2.nabble.com/-Moo--Request-and-evalScripts-tp2957436p2967576.html>
>> Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list
>> archive<http://n2.nabble.com/MooTools-Users-f660466.html>at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51
>
>
> ------------------------------
> View message @
> http://n2.nabble.com/-Moo--Request-and-evalScripts-tp2957436p3093446.html
> To start a new topic under MooTools Users, email
> [email protected]<ml-node%[email protected]>
> To unsubscribe from MooTools Users, click here< (link removed) >.
>
>
>
-----
The MooTools Tutorial: http://www.mootorial.com www.mootorial.com
Clientcide: http://www.clientcide.com www.clientcide.com
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/-Moo--Request-and-evalScripts-tp2957436p3093767.html
Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
