> Gee, I'm such a newbie I cannot make approach one work ..
All you need to do is create a Tips instance after you do the jQ
injection into the DOM. Right now, you are only creating the Tips
beforehand. So it naturally (given the way this class works, AFAICS,
it's natural) doesn't "grandfather" in the injected elements.
[1] Before the jQ.ajax():
var tipz = [];
//create the tooltips for static DOM els
tipz.push ( new Tips('.tipz',{
className: 'tipz',
fixed: false,
hideDelay: 50,
showDelay: 50
})
);
[2] Change jQ().html().appendTo() to inject div with class="tipz2"
instead of "tipz".
[3] After appendTo(), still inside jQ.ajax().
//create the tooltips for just-injected els
tipz.push ( new Tips('.tipz2',{
className: 'tipz',
fixed: false,
hideDelay: 50,
showDelay: 50
})
);
The concept here is a small array of Tips objects. I'm assuming you
need some core set of Tips before you inject the dynamic elements. If
you don't, then just discard the first tipz.push.
--Sandy
P.S. Now I know why people hate jQ syntax! Guess we need to get MT XML
up to snuff. Or you could move to JSON here -- any reason not to?
------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [email protected]
------------------------------------
