Ok, just think about what you are writing, i'm not face to face with you so i don't know if you are being rude or just advising me, remember that.
We are here as a free help and, as a human, i can sometimes not understand exactly the question, it doesn't mean i hadn't read it. That's ok, i'm not upset anymore. Cheers. -- Fábio Miranda Costa Solucione Sistemas Front-End Engineer http://meiocodigo.com On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:51 AM, atwork8 <[email protected]> wrote: > > @Fabio - What is it exactly that you are still upset about? If it's > because I asked you to please read the problem again before answering, > then please accept my sincere apology. I'll try not to be so abusive > towards you in the future. > > On Aug 28, 1:49 pm, Fábio M. Costa <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you have the references for the node you want to adopt it will be > almost > > the same thing as set/get html. > > > > @atwork8, just testing, is "Please, shut the fuck up" rude for you? > > > > -- > > Fábio Miranda Costa > > Solucione Sistemas > > Front-End Engineerhttp://meiocodigo.com > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:07 PM, atwork8 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If I came across as being rude it wasn't intended, apologies. I felt I > > > was clear on what the problem was and even provided my current > > > solution. The first answer I received seemed to ignore this and > > > provide a solution that was exactly the opposite of what I had asked, > > > hence I asked Fabio to read the problem again (and used the word > > > "Please"). > > > > > In the simple scenario of wrapping an element's html, are there any > > > performance gains using adopt over get/set html? > > > > > Cheers > > > > > On Aug 27, 9:33 pm, nwhite <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > One would ask the question "Why don’t you just output the wrapper > div > > > in > > > > > your html?" > > > > > > Sometimes you don't have full control over the html generation. > > > > > > @atwork8 I thought your tone was a bit rude especially when your > asking > > > for > > > > help. A bit of diplomacy will get you farther. > > > > > > I would use adopt since it will take multiple elements. > > > > > > new Element('div',{'id : > > > > > 'wrapper'}).adopt($(document.body).getChildren()).inject(document.body); > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: ksamdev [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > Sent: Friday, 28 August 2009 1:00 AM > > > > > To: MooTools Users > > > > > Subject: [Moo] Re: wrap element's html > > > > > > > @atwork8 > > > > > > > No benefits. The result would be the same except that work is done > > > > > with DOM objects directly if you do things the way I proposed which > I > > > > > find very clear and always tend to work with. It is simply > conceptual > > > > > difference. Anyway, I guess at the end browser will rearrange DOM > tree > > > > > and do the job in background putting all children into new DIV. > > > > > Besides, I guess, it will have to parse new HTML of document.body > that > > > > > would take some time. Thus, presumably, It is faster to work with > DOM > > > > > Tree. > > > > > > > On Aug 27, 7:36 am, atwork8 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > @ksamdev - what are the benefits of doing it that way over what I > had > > > > > > originally posted? > > > > > > > > var elBody = $(document.body); > > > > > > elBody.set('html', '<div id="wrapper">' + elBody.get('html') + > '</ > > > > > > div>'); > > > > > > > > On Aug 27, 1:27 pm, ksamdev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > ok. I see your point. Then do something like: > > > > > > > > > var _div = new Element( 'div'); > > > > > > > var _body = $( document.body); > > > > > > > _body.getChildren().each( function( _item) { _div.grab( _item); > }); > > > > > > > _body.adopt( _div); > > > > > > > > > On Aug 27, 7:22 am, atwork8 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > @ksamdev - Could you please read the problem. The results are > > > > > > > > completely different. The solution I've provided generates > this: > > > > > > > > > > <body><div id="wrapper">body's html</div></body> > > > > > > > > > > Fabio's generates: > > > > > > > > > > <div id="wrapper"><body>body's html</body></div> >
