in general I point to dependencies rather than bundle them. If the dependency is on github, I use submodules.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:00 AM, pradador <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the links. I took a look at both scripts and found what I > needed. Last question, what is the preferable way to implement > something like this? Should I include it myself in my class, use and > include $uses in the release package, or simply tell users it requires > MooTools-more to use that feature? > > On Sep 29, 10:28 am, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > > In addition to $uses, which is pretty slick, there's a mootools > dependency > > loader coming out this week. > > In both cases, it's a best practice to pass in a function callback. > MooTools > > does this with effects, chaining, ajax, etc. > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Thierry bela nanga <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > simply great! > > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:14 PM, csuwldcat <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> I made a really light weight one, check it out: > > >>http://blog.citycrawler.com/?p=47 > > > > >> On Sep 29, 7:49 am, pradador <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > First off, I'm trying to implement a feature where scripts are > > >> > dynamically included into the page as needed. The code looks > something > > >> > like thishttp://pastie.org/634998andhere is the actual > > >> > implementation I'm using it in: > > >>http://lighterjs.code.pradador.com/browser/trunk/Lighter.js > > > > >> > So my question is, is there any way to tell the loadScript function > to > > >> > callback the function that called it in the first place? As it > stands > > >> > right now, I have to pass in the function I want to call as a > callback > > >> > for the load event. I remember the arguments.caller and callee > > >> > references but I believe these were deprecated. Is there any cross- > > >> > browser way to achieve this? > > > > > -- > > >http://tbela99.blogspot.com/ > > > > > fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51 >
