If you didn't want to inject the images with javascript. If they were in your html source.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Rolf -nl <[email protected]> wrote: > > Right. For images one could also use Asset.images to load them all and > then using the returned img elements to get the size, no? I mean when > - in case of images - would you use Group as far as loading if you > have Asset.images? > > On Nov 4, 8:46 pm, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > > if you group classes that don't have that event, the group event will > never > > fire. > > > > but if you have a bunch of images, you can group them and watch their > load > > event. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Rolf -nl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > @Aaron (& slightly off topic); with the Group classyou add events that > > > are available in the classes you add the group, right? I mean, for > > > Ajax calls you can use complete etc. In theory, what would happen if > > > you would group ajax and tween and ... classes or classes that don't > > > have that event? > > > > > On Nov 4, 8:23 pm, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > .... or attach your image measurements to the load event *of the > image*. > > > > > > If you want to wait for several images to load, see the Group class. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Thierry bela nanga < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Safari and google chrome run javascript faster than firefox on page > > > load, > > > > > > > I my script I usually to this > > > > > > > - add a delay of 6 - 10 second in script in the domready (may not > work > > > > > correctly on first page load) > > > > > - and / or I set width / height of the elements in css > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Oskar Krawczyk < > > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > >> You always need to preload the image if you want to get its size. > If > > > that > > > > >> works on Firefox, it's just a coincidence (caching). > > > > > > >> ___ > > > > > > >> Oskar Krawczyk > > > > >>http://nouincolor.com > > > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 18:20, mmjaeger <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > >>> Hello Aaron > > > > >>> Thanks for replying - I meanwhile figured out that for Safari to > get > > > > >>> the same results as Firefox, I need to preload the image? Does > that > > > > >>> make sense? > > > > > > >>> On Nov 4, 9:17 am, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> > can you put an example of this failing on mooshell.net? > > > > > > >>> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mmjaeger <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > Hello > > > > >>> > > I'm having an issue with the following code: > > > > > > >>> > > var tsize = this.thumbs[0].getDimensions({ computeSize: true, > > > styles: > > > > >>> > > ['margin', 'padding', 'border'] }); > > > > >>> > > console.log('tsize: ' + tsize.totalWidth); > > > > >>> > > console.log('tsize: ' + tsize.totalWidth); > > > > > > >>> > > console.log('computed size: ' + > this.thumbs[0].getComputedSize > > > > >>> > > ().totalWidth); > > > > > > >>> > > in both cases, Firefox returns 95 which is correct while > Safari > > > > >>> > > returns 0 > > > > > > >>> > > I'm using 1.2.4 and 1.2.4.2 - Am I doing anything wrong or > what's > > > the > > > > >>> > > issue and how could I get the correct values? > > > > > > >>> > > Thanks > > > > > > > -- > > > > >http://tbela99.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51 >
