To be more specific, I've been using PE on many of my projects, including:
http://lasttweet.com (click on one of the four style boxes)

O.
___

Oskar Krawczyk
http://nouincolor.com


On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]>wrote:

> Two words: *Progressive Enhancement*
>
> :-)
>
> ___
>
> Oskar Krawczyk
> http://nouincolor.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ryan Florence <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> That's awesome.
>>
>> Have you worked with Raphael.js much?
>>
>> Unfortunately it will be a long time before IE supports CSS3, and an
>> infinitely longer time until it's users upgrade.
>>
>> Luckily, many of us can create internal web apps that can exclude IE--so
>> we can use this sort of stuff.  I love it.
>>
>>     Ryan Florence
>>
>> [Introducing MooDocs - become a better developer](
>> http://blog.flobro.com/ )
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 26, 2009, at 6:06 AM, Thierry bela nanga wrote:
>>
>> Note: Only works on Safari 4 or Firefox 3.5.
>>
>> he said,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Steve Onnis <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Doesn't work in IE
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: pradador [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, 26 November 2009 8:53 PM
>>> To: MooTools Users
>>> Subject: [Moo] Fx.Rotate - A little fun with MooTools
>>>
>>> I needed a knob-like control for a project so I started playing around
>>> with some CSS and MooTools and came up with this toy. It lets you
>>> rotate an element using some of the new CSS3 properties.
>>>
>>> Check out the demo at http://mooshell.net/B2mC3/ or you can download
>>> the (experimental) script at
>>> http://moodocs.net/pradador/pradador/Fx.Rotate.
>>> Be sure to try the spin button, it's kinda fun!
>>>
>>> You know, it's actually kinda crazy how fast you can do a proof of
>>> concept using MooTools, MooShell, and MooDocs. Getting quite a kick
>>> out of all these new tools.
>>>
>>> Note: Only works on Safari 4 or Firefox 3.5.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://tbela99.blogspot.com/
>>
>> fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to